If
you cannot view this email please Click
Here
Rosemary Sinclair, Managing Director, ATUG, Opening Address ATUG 2008 - for a copy of the slides please Click Here Welcome to ATUG 2008 – ATUG’s annual 2 day update on the issues of the moment and the directions for the next 12 months. PACT Campaign At last year’s ATUG 2007 conference I spoke to you about ATUG’s PACT Campaign, a campaign to stop a determined, directed, targeted (one could say DDT) effort to roll-back the regulations supporting competition and choice for end users on the promise of a fast, fibre future. Our campaign, PACT, was about Protecting Australia’s Competitive Telecommunications sector – and ATUG Directors supported the campaign on behalf of all end users - including personal meetings and discussions in Canberra. We’re still watching competition, and the access and pricing issues, which underpin it, with hawk like vigilance BUT this year we have an additional crusade in mind – more of that later! Future Forums I also spoke to you about ATUG’s Future Forums which we announced as a year-long dialogue to really talk about • what
sort of broadband future Australia needs, BUT without doing away with competition. I will come back to what we learned from those forums and where to next a little later. HIGH COURT DECISION Let me make a few remarks about last week’s the High Court decision I have to say no-one was more surprised than I was by the notice the High Court is obviously taking notice of ATUG’s Annual Conference, coming out as they did last week to reassure us about competition in telecommunications and the rightful place for regulation in regard to essential infrastructure. The High Court’s judgment is short and to the point and contains some very significant reminders about the core objective of telecommunications legislation which has remained consistent through the history of changes • from
1981 when ATUG was formed The Access Part of the 1991 Telecommunications Act was intended: To promote the long-term interests of consumers of telecommunications services by: (a) promoting
and protecting competition …; and Under the Trade Practices Act, 1997, Declarations of Access to services, may only be made if: …the Commission is satisfied that the making of the declaration will promote the long-term interests of end-users …. A number of ACCC decisions about telecommunications matters must have regard to the long-term interests of end users. The 1997 Telecommunications Act’s main object is to provide: A regulatory framework that promotes: (a) the long-term
interests of end-users …and So what did the High Court make of all this? The High Court in para 33 of its judgment says: The objects thus identified in the 1997 Telecommunications Act and in Part XIC of the Trade Practices Act are wider than and different from that narrow self-interest which, statue apart, is all that one participant in a market would ordinarily consult when striking a bargain with another participant in that market.”In regard to the particular argument proposed by Telstra, the High Court concludes in para 52, “Telstra’s bundle of rights in respect of the PSTN has always been subject to the rights of its competitors to require access to and use of the assets.” The importance of this decision cannot be underestimated: It reminds us that the core policy objective is the long-term interests of end users and that competition and thus choice for end users is legitimately preserved through the telecommunications Access Regime in the Trade Practices Act. And believe me we didn’t send one of our PACT campaign badges to the High Court – they just used their commonsense! Future Forums During 2007 as well as campaigning for competition, ATUG was very focused on the future ahead for end users and the communications industry. We held four forums focused on the Future and I would like to publicly express my appreciation to the many people who participated in those discussions. Today I would like to report back what we found: The Demand Forum highlighted the need for a range of broadband speeds and pricing plans “fit for purpose”. Many end users are on a journey with broadband building their understanding of value. They do not want to be presented with very high speed but unaffordable broadband services, which have more bang than their wallets have bucks. Just as important for end users right now are proper plans where what you see in the ad is actually what you get; A market where
switching broadband providers is as seamless as switching mobile
providers End user confidence emerged as a key issue as the economy in all sectors looks to transform just about all transactions and processes based on the new connectivity. “Any to any connectivity” and “always on” are shared visions BUT the need for speed and the ability to pay is specific to each user. The Technology Forum came to the conclusion that fibre to the home/farm/business is the future for the fixed network BUT to meet market demands for affordable, ubiquitous, high and (sometimes low speed) broadband and to deal with the distance/density issues in Australia, wireless services have an important role to play. AND over time,
just as voice services have become mobile, so will broadband services – for
that segment of the market which is happy to pay the mobile premium
for convenience. End users are really not interested in the technical specification of the underlying platforms and don’t approach this debate with any ideological predisposition to one platform or another. The new world is an “Internet of Things” And the need for IPv6 and the migration issues associated with such a huge change were highlighted. The role of the SMART GRID rather than just the Smart Meter may provide the basis for increased infrastructure competition, but will require co-operation at unprecedented levels between Federal and State Governments through COAG and such processes, and with the private sector. And the Forum
felt access to competitive backhaul capacity within Australia and
internationally will become more urgent The Investment Forum came at a point in the cycle of Forums, when Australia had just had an election with broadband a key issue. The forum discussion focused on the rise and rise of social networking, better online content, smarter personal devices and the thinking by business and government about forms of Enterprise 2.0 or Agency 2.0 based on Web 2.0 technologies. Businesses are seeing the move to digital business “net” based working as critical to mission and hence on the investment radar. ATUG itself is
exploring Web 2.0 working as a way of meeting members’ needs
for information including direct international updates from experts. PPPs are about risk management – an issue exercising the minds of many in Canberra no doubt. New business models in the construction, operation end of the market are being matched with new business models in the content, applications end of the market. And all this innovation is taking place in a privately funded market where shareholder expectations are an important consideration – albeit not the only consideration as the High Court has reminded us. Broadband has to be affordable as well as available for end users and Australia as a whole to reap the benefits of this new economic and community infrastructure. The Policy and
Regulation Forum was more focused on FTTH developments and supporting
regulatory frameworks. • where incumbents build the FTTH networks, the issues are access to the switching network and fibre plant unbundling and the pricing of access; • where competitors build the FTTH networks, the issues crystallize around over-build. The characteristics of countries that are successfully deploying fibre include • Government
regulatory commitment; A number of countries are exploring “functional separation” as a way of dealing more efficiently and effectively with bottleneck infrastructure meaning effectively competitive sectors can be left to market forces. Beyond the “fibre build” debate, there remain some big policy questions arising from: • the merging
of the telephony and internet worlds; • scarce
resources such as spectrum becoming more abundant because of technology
developments; ATUG – Next
Steps holding a series
of discussions about Whether Australia needs a New Communications
Act? We will be advising
dates and venues shortly and hope to use Web 2.0 technologies to
involve our members all over Australia directly in the discussion. And now to the
Crusade Issue for 2008 When the ATUG Board discussed this issue a couple of weeks ago, the energy level in the room rose dramatically as example after example was given of staff traveling overseas coming home with bills for mobile services in the hundreds and thousands for just using the services they use at home. Industry’s promise is anywhere, anytime, ATUG’s response is Yes! But not at any price! Australia is actively engaged in international fora and agreements, World Trade, APECTEL, Closer Economic Relationship with NZ, bilaterals, Free Trade Agreements. We are encouraging all businesses to develop export markets. Overseas travel
is more and more an option for work, education, holidays. For consumers, local SIM cards and phone cards might be an answer but they’re not an answer for business and the Europeans have recently decided they’re no answer for European consumers. The time has come to stop the excess pricing for mobile services while traveling. We now know the cost of terminating mobile calls – in Australia, in Europe through recent decisions from the European Commission, in the US prices are now .07 of 1 US cent and minutes of use have skyrocketed - unsurprisingly, even in China and Indonesia regulators have taken action in the absence of market led outcomes to get cost based pricing for domestic roaming calls on mobiles.
For more information come to ATUG’s stand and collect one of our ATUG Opinions which will outline for you the full extent of the pricing excesses. And collect your ATUG Roam Fair badge! Join with us in making your voice heard in the places that matter – Roam Fair!
|
||||||||||||||||||||